Three items for an agent or broker, two for a brokerage, all of them clearly and prominently. The agent's licensee name, their Level 1 or Level 2 licence class, and the brokerage's authorized name and licence number. The brokerage's own materials carry its authorized name and licence number. Nothing in either may be false, misleading or deceptive.
The text above is quoted from FSRA's own proposed guidance on the use of team names, which reproduces the provisions it interprets. The regulations themselves are O. Reg. 187/08 and O. Reg. 188/08 under the Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act, 2006.
Team names are the case that catches people. If you trade as “The Somebody Team” inside a brokerage, FSRA's proposed position is that this is not prohibited, provided the team name sits alongside the brokerage's authorized name and licence number and your own name with your authorized title, that all mortgage documentation is completed in the brokerage's authorized name only, and — the design-relevant part — that the brokerage's name and number are not less prominent than the team name. That last condition is a typography decision, and it is an easy one to get wrong: if the team name is the header logo and the brokerage sits in small grey type at the foot of the page, the brokerage is plainly the less prominent of the two. Note that this guidance is still marked proposed, with its effective date listed as TBD.
One more thing sits behind all of it. Principal brokers have a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the brokerage and its authorized agents and brokers comply with the requirements under the Act — so an agent site is normally something your principal broker signs off before it goes live. I am a web designer, not your compliance officer: I will build the disclosure into the template so it appears on every page automatically, and the exact wording is a conversation between you and your brokerage.